Which master is better - a narrow specialist or a generalist. Why opinions are divided

When I started in the field of repair, I took on any job, and learned on the go, asking the masters and looking for information on the net. But on the Internet I came across the opinion that a person should do one thing, only then he is a pro, the rest is from the evil one.

The case for station wagons

We have a small village, and if you are not of all trades, then downtime without work will be frequent. We have to put doors, do plumbing, fix electrics, and on occasion lay tiles. In general, I started with the furniture constriction, my wife was worried and surprised when I went to do something for the first time, but I succeeded, and she calmed down.

So I am for generalists, because when you are renovating an apartment, you can calculate everything and arrange the order of work for yourself. When different specialists work, the owners may not know the order. For example, when they ordered me to lay an electrician, and the guys were already going to glue the wallpaper, what was it like? When generalists work, this will definitely not work.

Arguments for narrow-profile specialists

It is believed that the guys are deeply immersed in the profession, before learning all the nuances and subtleties, they take an expensive good tool for their tasks.

This speeds up the work and makes it of better quality, therefore, everyone should do this only, and related professions should be left in the distant, Soviet past. Such pies.

Subscribe, share, like, new story soon.