Stroebe armature. Comparing manual and mechanical methods.

When choosing a method of performing any work that is probably always an advantage to be on the side of process automation.

However, it happens that it all depends on the specific situation.

Availability of opportunities, the amount of work, the number of workers, and more impact on the specific choice.

So for me the choice appeared in the first series of aerated concrete reinforcement.

Namely, I was wondering how the same method is better, easier and make Stroebe armature faster.

This interest stems from the fact that the internet is about the same number of examples of manual and mechanical shtroblenie. And everywhere, like, everything is simple.

Truth will only practice.

But to try everything on their own experience, the options to do.

I've written about how I made a handmade wall chaser, with his own hands.

It's time to experience it.

For this purpose, as a template, I have attached the board on the surface of the blocks, so that along it cut Stroebe armature.

But., Taking the first meter, I realized that I needed to try something else.

Of course there may be the case in my homemade. But honestly, I do not know what is its fundamental difference from the store?

When I saw the D400 unit in front of him ( rather its fragments), I thought that it will be handled as in the oil. But even block such a density, according to my feelings, Stroebe hard. How to do it manually with a 500-m, I do not understand ???

Well, that was something to compare.

In the mechanical method, I have seen the use of two tools - a Bulgarian and circular saw.

Both of these tools I have. And here a distinct advantage in conveyers.

• Cutting depth.
• The distance from the edge of the block.

All these adjustments are included in the function normal circular saw.

The fact that it does not make any effort, I think, do not need to talk ...

After sawing, it is necessary to break down all the "content" of the grooves ...

For this I used an ordinary trowel, which is inserted into the cut and light touch to break out the block elements that had to be easy to remove from Stroebe.

The only thing that can be called are heavy - it is the monotony of work. Trifles certainly missing here. But physical exertion and fatigue are practically no here.

Correction.

Without improvements, too, can not do. This method does not give the final result, under suitable reinforcement. All the same, there are irregularities that would prevent normal stacking reinforcement.

Here and need your hands.

Manual wall chaser immediately useful than ever. To align and Stroebe improvements, work was easy and simple to him. And most importantly - it is necessary.

Eventually I got straight Stroebe, which can be obtained without effort and a small pile of waste the use of which has not yet invented.

As a result, all handy.

In this case, I used the same methods, and all useful to me. However, the results of working with a circular saw, I was completely satisfied.

I can do that, with the responsibility to recommend to all!