It turns out that most houses can be considered a "non-capital structure". What influences this, and how is it being built now? Looking for an answer.

Only a capital structure can be registered, taken into ownership, and registered in it. But I never thought that from almost any normal house, you can make a "barn", recognizing it as a "non-capital structure". One has only to turn the laws as you need ...

Friends, everyone is a huge hello. Perhaps I would not have known about this problem if my acquaintance had not pushed me to this.

He is only at the planning stage of his home, and everything can not be determined with the foundation. Among the difficulties of choosing in terms of price-quality ratio, another criterion has appeared:

✅ Possibility of registration of the future building, and registration in it.

I was very surprised to learn about his doubts. Are there foundations that are considered somehow wrong or illegal? I decided to deal with this.

And then I'm building a house, or maybe in vain 🤔 ...

It turned out that everything is much more complicated.

And so that the house is recognized as a capital structure (that is, it was possible to register it as a property, and register in it

A non-capital structure is an object that does not have a strong connection with the ground, and its design allows move it, or disassemble and assemble it in a new place without changing its geometry, properties, and functionality object.

It turns out that difficulties can be not only with the foundation.

It turns out that if you can move a house even a few centimeters, it is no longer a capital structure. And this category includes all houses made of timber, logs, and frame frames, and on any foundation.

At one time, my grandfather moved his house from one village to another, across the river. I did it in winter, on a sleigh.

In our time, the most striking example is the reconstruction or replacement of the foundation (now you can find a bunch of ads on this topic). And one of the main stages is the rise of the house.

And current technology allows you to do similar operations with most houses.

An illusion may arise that you will definitely not get to the stone houses.

So I thought, too, until I saw this photo.

So it turns out, if desired, absolutely any building (at least within the framework of private housing construction) can be transported to a new location. And that means, according to the law, any house can be recognized as non-capital, and all the finances invested in it can be devalued.

So what to build from, and on what foundation?

✅ It turns out that it does not matter. And under the current laws, it all depends on what kind of cadastral engineer comes to you, and how you can negotiate with him.

Friends are waiting for your opinion in the comments. Perhaps there are some other points in this question that I missed? Be sure to write.

subscribe to the channel, and like it 👍. In spite of everything, my doi is slowly being built on, all the details are ahead.