Engines with a Pantone reactor running on a mixture of water and gasoline. Are there any fuel savings?

Everyone knows that the efficiency of a gasoline internal combustion engine (ICE) is 20-25%. Over the past 20 years, engineers have increased this figure slightly. The revolution will not work here, because losses cannot be excluded from the design of the internal combustion engine itself:

They are trying to apply new geometry of friction parts, lubricating oils on synthetic elastomers of the latest generation (so-called metal conditioners). But how to use the heat from fuel combustion - they cannot guess. The maximum is that the flow in turbines is used for turbocharging, to increase the power of the internal combustion engine, but not to increase its efficiency.

The efficiency of a diesel internal combustion engine is higher: a turbocharged diesel has an efficiency of up to 53%. And all because less heat is lost in a diesel engine, most of the fuel is converted into mechanical energy (it heats up less).

It turns out that for about 40 years there has been a technology, or rather a simple modification for an internal combustion engine, which allows using the thermal energy of exhaust gases to convert the mixture into fuel. Yes, you read that right: the energy of the exhaust gases supposedly converts

mixture of 75% water and 25% fuel into the fuel-air mixture, which is supplied to the internal combustion engine and increases its efficiency (the fuel consumption decreases, since water decomposition products are involved in the resulting volume).

The revolutionary development of the internal combustion engine for fuel economy is called Pantone reactor, or Geet-reactor:

Diagram of a simple design and the design of the reactor itself (second slide)

As I understand, the reactor works like this. Waste gases from the exhaust manifold are transferred to the reactor. They heat the reactor (tube) to at least 500 grams. (sometimes up to 1000 g.), then the mixture of water and fuel is evaporated from a sealed container. The fuel mixture enters the reactor and there water decomposes to hydrogen and oxygen. Probably, further hydrogen reacts with fuel, increasing hydrogen bonds and, mixed with oxygen, enters the combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine.

An old video with the inventor himself.

It turns out that thanks to the thermal energy of the exhaust gases, a full-value fuel is synthesized from a mixture of water and fuel. The efficiency increases by many tens of percent. There is no fantasy or fake about perpetual motion machines here. Chemistry combined with physics: the use of thermal energy from exhaust gases for fuel synthesis, as I wrote above. Anything can be used as 25% of fuel: solvents, crude oil. But the point will only be to increase efficiency and obtain fuel economy. This is not a clean water engine!

An example of a 600 W petrol generator (with a Honda 78 cm3 internal combustion engine).

How effective is it with this refinement? Let's make a simple calculation. For the production of one kWh of electricity, a gas generator consumes 0.35 liters of fuel. This means that this one with a rated load of 500 W will consume 0.04375 l / h of gasoline (based on 75/25 water and fuel). 1.8 rubles / hour for 500 W of energy. It's not bad if there is no electricity in some place. Let's say, in remote areas, fishing, etc.

The peculiarity of the engine operation is that it must be started in normal mode on ordinary gasoline, the reactor must be warmed up for 10-20 minutes, and then switched to a mixture of water and fuel.

Measurements of exhaust gas indicators are given:

The exhaust gases of the internal combustion engine operating with the Pantone reactor contain less carbon monoxide and more oxygen. It is more environmentally friendly. The fuel burns out completely. excess oxygen and internal combustion engines even release it.

This is not the only incarnation of the Western inventor and his followers. Geet-reactor was tested on many internal combustion engines:

The site contains dozens of other examples of the installation of the Pantone reactor on various internal combustion engines. This was done in the period 2000-2011. Including powerful diesel generators, tractors, motorcycles and cars. Perhaps something is still working there in Europe. There are also scans of various notes and publications in magazines. But later they stopped filling the site.

I don't think this is fake. There are many videos on youtube showing the operation of an internal combustion engine with a Geet-reactor. There is a development, but it was not appreciated, not noticed and did not start. The question is: why didn't they pay attention to this development? It also saves fuel (greatly increases efficiency)! But the point is that fuel should not be saved, but consumed. The answer is clear. He moves from the economic to another plane.

Also on youtube there are opinions that although it works, this engine with the Pantone reactor does not give any savings. Moreover, it does not work under load. Who tried to install the reactor - write your opinion in the comments.

But if the installation is working (for example, it just needs to be adjusted, set up) - in what way can this development be beneficial to a simple summer resident, builder or villager? If you have a walk-behind tractor, a gas generator, a gas mower, a tractor, then by assembling and installing a Pantone reactor for your equipment, we get fuel savings (or an increase in efficiency). It depends on which side you look at.

***

Photos are taken from open sources, from Yandex. Pictures

Subscribe to the channel, add it to the browser bookmarks (Ctrl + D). There is a lot of interesting information ahead.