Dome house - the cheapest karkasnik? Check the real-world example

In our time, reducing the level of income of ordinary citizens, actually all the inexpensive Economy options. Most began to count every penny and look at the price tags. I think that because of this total lack of financial capacity will increasingly be the choice to frame houses on screw piles, even those private developers who have financial ability to build there my house.

Argued that the cheapest version of a frame house - dome house. I suggest checking out.

The structure usually consists of a hemisphere of the frame beams, sometimes at elevated too low and wireframe "cylinder". The roof and walls of the structure - are combined in a single structure:

The foundation of someone traditionally make on screw piles:

But as previously I wrote a separate article about this kind of foundation - it is not the best in the future use, even though the most inexpensive.

Someone makes a tape floors on wooden joists or backfill soil. But it is better to fill immediately slab 20 cm tall base and then pour the warm floors. You can even UWB:

Posted permanent formwork units may gas concretes. If you use the D300 density, it will be a kind of insulation, and even foundation. Just do not forget to carry out communication in advance under the slab.

Warming of the frame - Basalt mineral slab. Outside sheathed with OSB. Inside - plywood, paneling. Heated like most karkasnikov - electricity. Sometimes the small area lacks only the floor heating.

Roofing material - bitumen roof shingles. Other options from the list of running material is not here.

When a large area of ​​the dome house - it is done bi-level. When small amounts of base (visually it looks small) - inside is a lot of room and space. There is a drawback - the unusual geometry of the rooms.

Let's see the interior of the dome of the finished house (in the first photo):

Immediately struck by the unusual triangular shaped windows. Because frame made of triangular modules, and windows need to enter in this geometry.

Inside obbivat clapboard - too costly work necessary to file down the workpiece at a certain angle. But it looks even more beautiful at an angle.

If you do not fit the interior of the tree - it can be made of drywall and paint. Wallpaper on such arcs and curves are not pokleit.

Yes, the interior is unusual because of its geometry, the slope of the walls. But the attic - not better.

According to information from the owners of this dome home, winter heating 180 m2 (Footprint) warm floors only electricity they give 5000 rubles. Summer - 500 rubles.

The house cost about 3.5 million. rubles under the key. This is if we do nothing for himself. Is comparable to the price of a good frame house. it 19.5 thousand. rub. / m2.

frame assembly and sheathing of the house - can be two people. Prices for housing sets with small squares dome houses:

12 thousand. rub. / m2 domokomplekta for single-level dome homes. If you take the one-storey house of aerated concrete 10x10 and just do everything yourself, the cost of the walls and roof (box) will cost 600 thousand. - the foundation has not yet take into account in both cases. Read reviews when samostroyschiki of 1-1.2 million. erected two-storeyed house of GB.

Obtained from GB only 6 thousand. rub. / m2. The difference in half!

Perhaps for building dome base 180 m2 3.5 m million. - it is not expensive. So where are the savings compared to the traditional rectangular design version of a frame house? Saving only the design of the roof and foundation. A square of roofing materials - on the contrary greater (on the whole area of ​​the hemisphere).

There may be some savings on heating:

- The sphere has the smallest surface area of ​​the walls as opposed to rectangular;

- Less used frame parts - less cold bridges;

- Due to the aerodynamics are not blown out the heat from the premises;

- A more even distribution of heat and its circulation.

Another plus that I see - a dome home, you can build a very small area - 30-50 m2. And he will not look like a chicken coop, compared to the same area of ​​the traditional frame house.

The global economy, I do not see when you select this option at home. And compared with other materials - even a huge overpayment. And the kind of unusual turns on the fan. As they say - for those who do not depend on public opinion. The main plus for self-construction - ease of assembly and construction.

***

Photos taken from public sources, with Yandex service. Pictures

Subscribe per channel, introducing it in the browser bookmarks. There is a lot of useful information and interesting articles.